The always-cogent Phil Lawler has provided a good analysis of what's presently known about the dust-up between Fr. Pavone of Priests for Life and his bishop.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blessed James Grissinger
Patron of stained glass workers
What's really in it?
Coming soon to your town
The real price of "choice"
Sonitus Sanctus
Blog Archive
Catholic resources
Blogs I like
- California Catholic Daily
- Causa Nostrae Laetitiae
- Church of the Masses
- Creative Minority Report
- Dhimmi Watch
- Dyspeptic Mutterings
- Jihad Watch
- Musica Sacra
- Musings of a Pertinacious Papist
- Orthometer
- Some Have Hats
- Some Wear Clerics
- Sunlit Uplands
- Suzy B
- The Anchoress
- The Bovina Bloviator
- The Society of St. Barbara
1 comments:
Lawler made a big mistake. He linked the Sept. 14 Fr. Pavone TV interview, and then wrote exactly the opposite of what Fr. Pavone actually said, regarding the religious order/seminary expenditures in the Diocese of Amarillo. Everyone should check this out for themselves, and then consider if the article "Fr. Pavone's Last Stand" was a "good analysis" or something else altogether.
Post a Comment